Potter Perfect Stephen Fry

An hommage to Stephen Fry's incredible reading abilities

As a long-time self-proclaimed Harry Potter fan, I have read all seven books at least two times, and the last four several more. Which is all fun. But in addition to this I have listened to the audiorecordings read by Stephen Fry an embarassingly high number of times. Sitting there on the iPod they are so easy to access and many a walk, pre-bedtime minutes and times when I feel I need additional comfort, security or just to be surrounded by a sense of family (yes, I know the characters so well I now consider them part of my family), has been graced by Fry's outstanding interpretation of Rowling's Potter world.

I generally like reading for myself better than listening to audio books; nothing above, nothing equal to it. But with Fry's performance I actually think the books gets an extra dimension, or rather that it is so well transmitted through Fry that I stop thinking about that someone is reading aloud, that there is someone else interpreting the characters I know so well from the books. And that, to me, is quite an achievement. Additionally, it is not only me thinking this, but all people I have talked to about this agrees. My mother, whom I had long recommended reading the Potter books, first got hooked when I gave her all seven Potter books on her newly bought iPod. She started out listening to the Norwegian version, but did not find the reading satisfactory (or, perhaps, the translation, as I myself find the books far better in the original British-English than in translation). However, when she - grudgingly, as she does not feel too comfortable reading English novels - started on the Potter series, she could not get enough! I think she raced through all seven books in two to three weeks, something which is quite a feat, considering the length of the last four novels and a packed work schedule. No one was allowed near her iPod as she then might lose track of where she was at in the present Potter story.

This did not surprise me a bit; the Potter novels seem to have that effect on readers. But it did please me, as it allowed my mother some well-earned breaks from her demanding job and probably increased her energy levels.

Isn't it just wonderful that literature can have this impact on people? And how grateful am I that there are interpretors such as Stephen Fry out there. Well, by now you can probably tell ;-)

Beedle the Bard and I

Today I'd like to post the text I entered for the Beedle the Bard-competition held by Amazon UK and US. The winner of this competition would be awarded a trip to London, stay in a hotel, and most important of all - be allowed a reading of Ms Rowling's unpublished book of handwritten stories (which only exists in 7 copies), namely The Tales of Beedle the Bard. As I would be thrilled by this experience, I naturally entered the contest.

There were three tasks you could choose among, writing in a "creative" way. (This adjective annoys me a little; what writing is not creative?) You were only allowed one entrance, and that entrance should not consist of more than 100 words. Which is not a lot. Of course, judging by the 10 finalists in each of the two age groups (13-18 and 18 and above), every smartass understood this as writing in verse, that is to say, old fashioned, rhyming poetry. To me, poetry can exist everywhere, not only in rhythmical, pulse-driven verse. Although you get to say a lot in a few words with the tried and tested ballad-style.

Nevertheless. The three options you had were:

• What songs do wizards use to celebrate birthdays?
• What other sports do wizards play besides Quidditch?
• What have you learned from the Harry Potter series that you use in everyday life?

- and I chose the first, as the theme of music and magic struck me as the most poetical of the three. (Of course, the winner wrote a versified answer to the least poetical of the three, namely the last one. And it really was quite good, also she was under 18, which is a good thing in this kind of competition.)

So, tata, here is my response to what songs wizard sing to celebrate their birthdays:

When each wizard is born a colour surrounds them, and in this colour there is a sound. Every birthday allows the colour of their soul to seep out for a while, bringing with it a new sound. In this way a song starts to form. When a wizard's birthday is celebrated, their family and friends gather and listen to the new song performed by the wizard himself and sing it back to him. In the end of his life the song envelops the wizard as a deeply coloured fabric. Purple is only worn by wizards with especially beautiful soul songs.

© Tuva Langjord 2008

A modern heroine revealed

I love this portrait of J.K. Rowling, Harry Potter's mom. The whole atmosphere seems to mirror perfectly some inner state of closeness and simplicity I recognize as essential when sitting down to write.

I remember reading Ms. Rowling's own reaction to this portrait (painted by Stuart Pearson Wright) as capturing her in paint more than she thought possible for someone not close to her. In my opinion, not even those close to you will often be able to portray you in such an illuminating way. They may be able to describe you in words, perhaps, or list the things you like to do, which authors you like, what music you listen to, which movies you choose to view over and over - but to capture something central about you in a flash like in a painting or a poem, very few are able to do.

That is why, when it finally happens in one way or another, I feel a sense of gratitude. Perhaps you might view this as a kind of vanity, of a want to be seen and understood, but really it is about recognizing truth and then conveying it. And to me this portrait reveals something essential about this woman's creative space, which resembles most artists' locus of creativity; a lonely but wonderfully rich and exciting place in one's psyche.

You must dare to be still, or no work of art will leave your hands.

(I happened to read this article today, showing that Rowling, the now deservedly successful author has hit lows to equal her present heights.)

I morgen vet vi alt om Harry Potter

I morgen kommer den, en bok som får flere års lesning, undring, spekulering, diskusjon og filosofering til å stilne. Med den siste Harry Potter-boka, Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, får vi se hva Rowlings plott faktisk er.

Et av hennes sterkeste trekk er et solid, antakeligvis erfaringsbasert vett og vidd, hun staver fram leveregler som ikke er tenkt fram, de er sprunget ut av et virkelig liv. Det er selvsagt nødvendig med et godt hode for å trekke generelle regler/lover ut av erfaring, men det er det vel få som betviler at Rowling har. I grunnen tror jeg på at de aller fleste mennesker har et enormt potensiale, at enhver har uutgrunnelige sjelelige dybder -- men jeg har ikke like stor tro festet til hvordan den menneskelige mulighet forvaltes, utøves. Jeg blir stadig sjokkert over ny kriging, ny bestialitet osv, men er samtidig glad for å ha beholdt noe av min naivitet.

Men, her skulle det egentlig dreie seg om Potter. Det vil si Potter-plottet. Fram til nå er det ingen som faktisk vet hvor god historien er. Fram til nå har vi bare fulgt en rekke mysterier, fnist av humoren og kjent hvordan våre "moral fibres" styrkes gjennom lesningen av Potter-sagaen. Vi aner at det er et stort, klassisk oppgjør mellom ondt og godt som er i anmarsj, men vi vet ikke hvordan det utføres. Kanskje er det en vri på den klassiske lidelsesfortellingen, hvor Harry må ofre seg for at Voldemort skal dø, men så står opp igjen etter nåde fra naturlovene. Eller kanskje lærer Harry hvordan han skal overliste sitt negative avtrykk Voldemort, det vil si gjennomrisle Hr V med enkel godhet, noe som vil bli for skjørt og for sterkt for Voldemort, ettersom han har fortrengt og ødelagt alt av objektiv plussverdi i eget liv.


'Det enkle er det beste', er en av mange læresetninger man kan trekke ut av Potter-sagaen. Det er på ingen måte merkelig at en vanlig kvinne fra arbeiderklassebakgrunn i et av verdens største språksamfunn har slått så voldsomt igjennom klodelangs. Hun frisker opp vår etiske grunnstamme, den vi vet aldri råtner, den vi vet er den mest riktige og solide, og som vi aner har sin første sevje fra de tidligste mennesker. Bare det at vi er mennesker, gjør at en slik stamme er naturgitt. Vi vet at vi har muligheten til det gode og lyse, og at jo mer lys vi kaster, jo lengre og mørkere kan skyggene bli.

Det er så fundamentalt enkelt, det Rowling gjør, men det er hennes måte å gjøre det på, måten hun tvinner historien rundt dette åpenbare og i alle gjenkjennelige, som gjør at hun leses med så stor lyst over alt. Enkelt, med humor og vidd, og menneskelig varme - en trygg og riktig nærhet som vi alle kjenner igjen fra vi var barn og verden var overskuelig, lys og trygg.

Denne historien kommer nok til å få større betydning enn mange av dagens lesere tenker på. På overflaten er det jo først og fremst drivende god underholdning. Men for mange unge er det et par skritt inn i et solid fundamentert univers, en verden drevet av mørke og lyse sider, men hvor det er helt tydelig at det lønner seg -- sjelelig først og fremst, og for omverdenen i forlengelsen av det -- å holde seg til det gode. Gjennom Hermione ser vi også hvordan kunnskap er viktig, bare den brukes rett. Ingen kan nekte for at Voldemort antakeligvis er mer kunnskapsrik enn resten av de magiske menneskene (ettersom Dumbledore nå er død), men han har forkastet enhver mulighet til å kunne kalles vis. Han er komplett ignorant når det kommer til mange solide innsikter om rett og riktig som Harry Potter har innarbeidet i ryggmargen.

Når vi ser hvordan Rowling har drevet fram disse karakterene, hva de har stelt i stand av vemmelig-fascinerende ondt og hjertegjennomlysende godt, er det umulig at Voldemort kan overleve denne historien. Det er faktisk umulig. Fortellingens storhet står og faller på hvordan hun utformer Harrys skjebne. At han vil overvinne Voldemort er klart. Men hvordan? Hvem og hvor mange kommer til å ofre seg for at Voldemort dør? Hvor mange av de Harry har gjennomlyst med sitt relativt rene hjerte har latt seg virkelig gjennomlyse, til den grad at de kommer til å ofre seg for at verden skal bli et bedre sted?

Avslutningen vil vise hvor stor tro J.K. Rowling har på at verden kan bli et bedre sted.

Og jeg? Jeg har stor tro på at hun tror den kan bli mye bedre, med mennesker som bryr seg om det gode i dem selv -- og dermed andre!

(Hvis du vil se hva jeg har skrevet om Rowling og Potter-bøkene før, se her.)

Harry Potter and the Longest Story on Earth

There is no hiding it: I am a Harry Potter fan.

And although I love the books by themselves, just the way they are, isolated from other literature, there is no way you can avoid the fact that these books express the newest version of the long, long story that has probably lived as long as people have inhabited the earth. You have it expressed in The Lord of the Rings by Tolkien (where Frodo and Sam explicitly refer to themselves as taking part in an overall story, far outliving them), fairytales throughout the world, in lore and popular fiction, ballads, songs and so on. Where it all comes from is of course the next question, but the answer to that is still a bit beyond where I have tread. (Although I think it has something to do with where psychology comes from - what shapes us as humans, why we realize our Being in the shape of humans.)

There is the obvious "good vs bad" theme in the Potter books. There is also a demonstration of the human ability to create - to flesh out the web of ideas and deeply rooted images we all take part in. Rowling is brilliant in the way she uses fantasy, in creating a fully inhabited universe that we want to live in and explore on our own. She presents us with mystery, interesting characters, intelligent storylines, tragedy, comedy, solid friendships and a fight for life. The story she produces is as many-layered as expressed by the great variety of people who love her books (her tale, her long story). I think every reader meets her text with his or her own backdrop of ideas, feelings, memories, preferences etc, factors that make a person that particular person. And despite of this, nearly everyone reading her story gets engulfed. In a good way! I take it as a mark of her genius.

This story incorporates all the stories that went before it, and takes it a few steps further, into our own time - or, rather, the author is one step ahead of us, sketching out a newer, fresher world order. Something we feel it is worth reaching out for, something we feel as being the natural next step in the world as we know it.

Everything that is made and put forth in this world leaves an imprint of itself. Everything existent is always coloured by everything else. The Harry Potter saga (still in the making, that is one of the things that is so fantastic about it! that we get to share the long process from beginning to end, not knowing how the story ends) is without question the biggest, most successful story of our time.

One of the reasons, I think, is because Rowling is exactly one or more steps ahead of us all of the time. She made this universe and, more important still, she made the plot, which every good story springs from and moves towards. The plot is not yet revealed to us so the saga of the saga is also unfinished. (The saga of the saga might never finish, as I am sure you are very well aware). The real size and quality of the story, then, is yet to be unfolded. But the quality of the six books we already know leave us with no doubt that the last and concluding chapter (book 7) will live up to the expectations. Probably it will even transcend the previous ones, perhaps leaving some behind, dissatisfied. But more people are going to love it and see that this was the only way the story could be concluded, this was what the population of the world needed to read in the beginning of the 21st century. I believe that.

That is how much trust I place in J. K. Rowling.

T